Wednesday, February 12, 2020

Is the decline in public support for education inevitable?


Is the decline in public support for education inevitable?


Charles Ungerleider, Professor Emeritus, The University of British Columbia
[Permission to reproduce granted if authorship is acknowledged]


Increased demands for services combined with tax aversion have put enormous pressure on governments to “do more with less” especially in public schools. Public schooling is suffering and will continue to suffer the ravages of demography, eroding pubic support, increasing privatization, internal migration, and income inequality.

Regardless of the details of the approach (model) for the provision of services, all approaches must consider the numbers of recipients of the service and the resources that the recipients need. This is especially true of public education. Almost everywhere in Canada publicly supported school boards must confront a variety of challenges affecting the number of children enrolled and the funding necessary for their education.

At the most basic level, childlessness is increasing; there are fewer children born to women who are, on average, older than was the case in the past; and the proportion of the school age population is shrinking in relation to the proportion of the population over 65 years of age. In relative terms, the “client base” for public schools is declining and in some places the numbers of school-age children and youth are falling. 

The support that public schools once enjoyed – even among families – is declining relative to other demands. Ensuring employment and caring for an older family member place significant demands on families, diminishing the importance they place on public schooling.

Increasing privatization of education is also eroding enrollments in, and support for, public school systems. Privatization takes many forms: home schooling, virtual schooling, charter schools, religiously-oriented independent schools, elite private schools, ethno-linguistic private schools, specially focused schools (Montessori, Waldorf, etc.). The political and social support that local public schools once enjoyed is being increasingly challenged by school choice and the competition among schools for their “market share.”

The economics of public school are also influenced by the migration of families from less densely populated areas to more densely populated urban areas. The impact of the transition is more pronounced in the schools from which these migrants leave. Schools and services not filled to capacity must still be maintained for the students who remain or must be closed. Schools with small student numbers cannot offer the full range of programs and services that schools with greater numbers can provide. This increases the cost of schooling. Even when schools are closed - a very difficult choice for school authorities - the students must be transported to the nearest available school.

Income inequality is another factor that poses problems for public services, including public schools. Income inequality has grown and continues to grow in Canada and has had a negative impact on the economy. Taxes and government transfers (child benefits, old age security, social assistance, unemployment insurance, etc.) help to reduce, but not eliminate, income inequality. But taxes that support government transfers to reduce inequality compete with claims for increased resources for publically funded schools. Recognizing that transfers are not sufficient to reduce severe inequality, governments are developing poverty reduction strategies. If these strategies are successful, they will reduce the pressure on schools and other services and free up some of government transfers for other purposes.

Schooling produces a good social return on investment. It helps to build capacity and reduce economic inequalities, suggesting that it is in everyone’s interest to cushion public schooling from the forces outlined above. Doing so would require increasing taxation – doubtful in today’s tax averse, political climate. But, even if taxes were increased, the resources generated would probably be insufficient to satisfy the public’s competing demands for public services. Demographic changes and the changing needs of the population will continue to affect the level of resources that institutions such as public schooling receive.