Wednesday, June 10, 2020

It shocks the conscience


Charles Ungerleider, Professor Emeritus of Education, The University of British Columbia
[permission granted to reproduce if authorship acknowledged]

The enduring police racism toward Black men shocks the conscience. “Shocks the conscience” is a legal judgment that a government’s agent has acted in a manner that is outside of the boundary of human decency. Such racism is systemic, by which I mean discriminatory values and practices are deeply imbedded in society’s laws and institutions, including the legal, political, economic and its education systems.

Let me illustrate another system in which racism operates in the United States, and then show how it works in Canada and show its connection to education. The forcible separation of a child from their asylum-seeking, immigrant parents in the United States was abhorrent. In a ruling requiring that children must be reunited with their families within 30 days, a judge said that the Government’s practice of separating children from their parents and failing to reunite them shocks the conscience.  

Family separation was a deliberate strategy of the U.S. government designed to deter migrants from attempting to enter the United States without authorization. The strategy provoked outrage around the world. One subtext to the outrage was that the cold-hearted policy was simply another manifestation of the contempt that the current US President has espoused toward immigrants and people of colour. A second subtext in this country was self-righteousness: “Canada would never do anything like that!”

Aboriginal children were separated from their parents and sent to residential schools beginning in the last quarter of the 19th century, a practice that continued for about 100 years but whose impact may be felt for generations to come. The education Indigenous children received in residential schools was a form of cultural genocide; Indigenous children were prevented from speaking their languages and their contact with families and communities was restricted in a conscious attempt to “take the Indian out of the Child.”  The children and grandchildren of residential school survivors have suffered from the impact of the trauma their parents experienced directly.

Just prior to the Judge’s ruling in the US family separation case, the Society for Research in Child Development (SRCD) issued a “statement of evidence” in which it documented the body of research showing that family separation has damaging psychological  and health consequences for children, their families and communities. According to the SRCD, the problems engendered by parent child separation do not end when parents and their children are reunited.

The research, to which the SRCD referred, dates to studies of the impact of family separation during the Second World War showing that the effects can be long-lasting – even when parents and children have been reunited.  The effects include increased risk of mental illness, poor inter-personal relations, reactivity to stress and even mortality. Both parents and children can be affected by the separation and separation can produce negative consequences across the lifespan of the children and their children’s children.

In Canada, even after the closure of most of the residential schools, removing Indigenous children from the homes of their parents and placing them in foster homes was a relatively common practice that was evident through the 1980s.  The practice was not confined to Indigenous parents and children. Children of Sons of Freedom Doukhobors and unwed mothers were also separated from their children (who were defined as ‘illegitimate’ children) and placed in foster or adoptive families.

The children and grandchildren from families that have been separated may suffer most but the entire community is affected by them as well. Schools, health, justice, and social welfare systems must address the cognitive, emotional, physical, and inter-personal effects of family separation.

The disgust we felt about the use of family separation as a method of social control signals greater empathy on our part. But we should not be so pious as to believe that it cannot happen again. The roots of such practices are built into the human calculus of the social system, suggesting that some lives are more valuable than others. Those roots must be completely removed from all systems.

Canadian public schools today are more likely to address the devastating impact of colonization on Indigenous people than in the past. But they still teach history as if the settlers are central to the stories and the Indigenous peoples are “other” and marginal to the dominant narrative. Canadian history begins with settler contact as if there was no story prior to the arrival of Europeans.


Because of their centrality in the social system and their influence on beliefs and behaviours, schools are pivotal to the elimination of racism. The Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada has pointed the way toward reconciliation.[1] We must acknowledge the injustices done, recognize that they were part of the human calculus of the Canadian social system, commit to their elimination, and ensure that the values we profess – equality among all people – are built into our social system.





[1] Many of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission’s Calls to Action address education, language, and culture. https://nctr.ca/reports.php.