Wednesday, September 22, 2021

Reconciliation Requires Transformation

Charles Ungerleider, Professor Emeritus, The University of British Columbia

[permission to reproduce granted if authorship is acknowledged]

I am surprised at the number of Indigenous students whose families allow them to attend public schools in Canada. If I was a parent whose ancestors attended residential schools and was suffering from the inter-generational trauma that taking children from their families created, I would think twice about sending my children or grandchildren to schools established by settlers.

Most Canadians consider residential schooling as abhorrent, if not criminal. In fact, given their intent and the mistreatment of children and youth in their care, we should not call them schools. Although residential schools no longer exist, the public schools Indigenous children attend are settler institutions that do not reflect Indigenous epistemologies, language, or culture.  As recognized by the Truth and Reconciliation Commission:

Much of the current state of troubled relations between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal Canadians is attributable to educational institutions and what they have taught, or failed to teach, over many generations. Despite that history, or, perhaps more correctly, because of its potential, the Commission believes that education is also the key to reconciliation. (Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada, Honouring the Truth, Reconciling for the Future p. 234)

There are schools and school systems that are trying to shed the negative teachings of the past and incorporate Indigenous ways of knowing and being, but the efforts are nascent and sporadic.

Even if curricula reflecting Indigenous perspectives were widely available (which they are not), most non-Indigenous teachers do not understand Indigenous epistemologies sufficiently well to be able to adapt to new pedagogies and curricula to include them

An increasing number of schools are trying to incorporate Indigenous symbols, but I suspect that most Indigenous learners do not see themselves reflected in schools because the symbolism is not complemented by Indigenous content. My hunch is that there are Indigenous learners whose parents conceal the identities of their children because they are fearful of mistreatment.

Although the intentions are different, in rural and remote communities without a secondary school, there are students who must live away from their families and communities to attend school. I would not be comfortable sending my children away to school. But, if I did not send them, a social service agency would likely threaten to take them from me and make them Crown wards.

These are but a few of the impediments facing Indigenous learners that schools and the broader society must remove. But, unless they are removed, Indigenous parents are justified to distrust settler schools and only reluctantly allow their children to attend. Addressing the historic mistreatment of Indigenous people by settlers and the part that residential schools played in attempting to systematically eradicate Indigenous language and culture is a necessary step but one that is not sufficient.

Schools must acknowledge and value the knowledge that Indigenous children and youth bring to school. Instead of disregarding such knowledge, and in the process disparaging it, schools must use that knowledge as a foundation upon which to build. Children and youth, Indigenous and non-Indigenous are more likely to succeed when the knowledge they possess and the competencies they have are incorporated in the fabric of schools.

If Indigenous elders and knowledge-keepers were formally invited to participate in schools, they could help educate both students and the professional staff. That would be another step toward reconciliation. Land and nature play important parts in the lives of Indigenous people. Using land-based learning as the staging point for instruction rather than an extension to current approaches would recognize its value.

We need to fast-track the preparation and hiring of Indigenous teachers. Doing so won’t transform the curriculum and pedagogy but it will provide students with models of Indigenous leadership. There are examples of Indigenously focussed teacher education programs in existence for some time. While those continue, the registrars of teacher certification at the provincial level should authorize graduated certification to enable Indigenous people to combine employment with study to earn laddered certification.

The preparation of non-Indigenous teachers has improved in recent years in most faculties of education, but there is room for improvement. But improvements will remain limited until there are Indigenous faculty members who can help transform teacher preparation in more fundamental ways.

None of the suggestions I have made are new or radical. However, they are not part of the fabric of public schooling. Until they and other changes are incorporated, Indigenous parents will reluctantly allow their children to attend school, but they are unlikely to fully embrace schooling in settler institutions.