Wednesday, December 1, 2021

Cold and calculating, but ‘tis the season!

 Charles Ungerleider, Professor Emeritus, The University of British Columbia

[permission to reproduce granted if authorship is acknowledged]

 In last week’s blog I wrote about a proposal to provide tutoring as a means of closing the achievement gap between the students most disadvantaged by COVID-19 and those who were least affected. That blog focused on the unfortunate tendency to select familiar, preferred solutions to problems that are ill-defined. I suggested some questions one might ask to avoid putting the cart (the solution) before the horse (defining the problem clearly).

 This week I want to connect with my inner Scrooge and conduct a thought experiment about providing tutoring on a system-wide basis. There are approximately 5,000,000 elementary and secondary students in Canada. That’s about 500,000 per grade. We know from the accumulated evidence that tutoring is most effective in improving reading during the early years of school. But is it the most cost-effective way, always keeping in mind that dollars spent in this project can’t be used elsewhere?

 The literature indicates that the costs of mounting a tutoring program to supplement the instruction students receive at school are approximately $2,000 per student. These costs include training for tutors, criminal records checks, supervision, material, and payments to supervisors and often to tutors. Even when tutors are volunteers, the costs are considerable.

 The more effective tutoring programs are conducted one-to-one or in very small groups three times per week. We do not have an appraisal of the magnitude of the difference in reading between the students least affected and those most affected by COVID-19. Let’s assume, however, that the gap can be eliminated in a year’s time with the use of a well-run tutoring program. And for the purposes of this thought experiment, let’s assume that only 10% of the students need this program; the other 90% will overcome the educational gap on their own, and/or with regular school instruction, and/or with family support. The cost for a one year, Canada-wide tutoring program for the 10% of Canada’s grade two students (50,000) most disadvantaged by COVID-19 would be about $100 million.

 There is little doubt that the educational gap extends beyond 10% of Canada’s grade two student population to include a larger proportion of students at most, if not all, grade levels. To reduce a 10% gap across all grade levels through tutoring requires more than $1billion per year.

 Pursuing a tutoring program or any other program – as effective as it might be –requires careful consideration of a variety of factors. At a minimum it would be helpful to know the magnitude of the problem, the available alternatives for addressing the problem, as well as the cost and the expected impact of each alternative. That information would enable us to compare tutoring to efficient and effective alternatives (hiring additional teachers or educational assistants, for example, or providing existing teachers with professional learning to increase their effectiveness) and to the economic and social costs of doing nothing.

 It sounds cold and calculating. It is calculating, but that’s not something that we are accustomed to doing. If we did it more often, perhaps we would make better use of the scarce resources we have for the benefit of students.

 Season’s Greetings and Happy New Year

My blog will return in 2022!