Showing posts with label public schools. Show all posts
Showing posts with label public schools. Show all posts

Wednesday, November 3, 2021

Why public schools are public

 Charles Ungerleider, Professor Emeritus, The University of British Columbia

[permission to reproduce granted if authorship is acknowledged]

Parents seeking programs that they believe are in the “best interests” of their own children sometimes act as if the education they seek is a private benefit. In seeking an education that is in a child’s or grandchild’s best interest it is easy for parents or grandparents to lose sight of why public schools are public.

If education were primarily a private benefit, it would not be something supported by governments; it would be left to families to determine the why, the what, and the how of educating the young. But in enrolling their children in public school they do not have that discretion.

Governments provide for schooling because it is a public good, something of benefit to everyone. Few people read the legislation establishing public schools but doing so is instructive. The purposes of education are often set out in a public schools or education act that is readily accessible.

The Public Schools Act in Manitoba, for example, proclaims that “a strong public school system is a fundamental element of a democratic society.”[i] Alberta’s act simply says, “Education is the foundation of a democratic and civil society.”[ii] Ontario’s act declares that “a strong public education system is the foundation of a prosperous, caring and civil society.”[iii] Despite differences in the way it is expressed, the contribution of schooling to a democratic, civil society is among public education’s paramount purposes.

Several acts speak specifically about the active connection between public schooling and the health, prosperity, and well-being of society. Manitoba says that “public schools should contribute to the development of a fair, compassionate, healthy and prosperous society.”[iv] Nova Scotia describes that the primary mandate of its publicly funded school system is “to provide education programs and services for students to enable them to develop their potential and acquire the knowledge, skills and attitudes needed to contribute to a healthy society and a prosperous and sustainable economy.”[v]

In the context of setting out the purposes of public schooling, the various statements of purpose refer to individual students. However, they make clear that the development of the individual is in service to the [re]creation of society. Some are quite explicit about the link between the student and the student’s social contribution. Alberta, for example, states “the role of education is to develop engaged thinkers who think critically and creatively and ethical citizens who demonstrate respect, teamwork and democratic ideals and who work with an entrepreneurial spirit to face challenges with resiliency, adaptability, risk-taking and bold decision-making.”[vi]

In addition to the general references to democracy and civil society, some statements of purpose are more specific. British Columbia’s School Act says that educational programs are “designed to enable learners to become literate, to develop their individual potential and to acquire the knowledge, skills and attitudes needed to contribute to a healthy, democratic and pluralistic society and a prosperous and sustainable economy.”[vii] BC complements its School Act with a ministerial order devoted to the mandate of the school system that provides the rationale for the emphasis on social and economic goals:

Continued progress toward our social and economic goals as a province depends upon well-educated people who have the ability to think clearly and critically, and to adapt to change. Progress toward these goals also depends on educated citizens who accept the tolerant and multi-faceted nature of Canadian society and who are motivated to participate actively in our democratic institutions.[viii]

The BC ministerial order makes clear that individuals have an obligation to contribute to the development of that society, and specifies that the educational program is designed to produce citizens who are:

·         thoughtful, able to learn and to think critically, and who can communicate information from a broad knowledge base;  

·         creative, flexible, self-motivated and who have a positive self-image;

·         capable of making independent decisions;

·         skilled and who can contribute to society generally, including the world of work;

·         productive, who gain satisfaction through achievement and who strive for physical well being;

·         cooperative, principled and respectful of others regardless of differences;

·         aware of the rights and prepared to exercise the responsibilities of an individual within the family, the community, Canada, and the world.[i]

The public schools or education acts and related policies make clear that education is instrumental in developing the knowledge, values, and behaviours that citizens need to maintain a socially cohesive and productive society. The territory of Nunavut is perhaps the most explicit about the importance of the education system in preserving Inuit values and traditional knowledge.

 It is the responsibility of the Minister, the district education authorities and the education staff to ensure that Inuit societal values and the principles and concepts of Inuit Qaujimajatuqangit are incorporated throughout, and fostered by, the public education system.[x]

The principles and concepts of Inuit Qaujimajatuqangit define what it means to be a citizen in Nunavut:

•        Respecting others, relationships and caring for people (Inuuqatigiitsiarniq);

•        Fostering good spirit by being open, welcoming and inclusive (Tunnganarniq);

•        Serving and providing for family or community, or both (Pijitsirniq);

•        Decision making through discussion and consensus (Aajiiqatigiinniq);

•        Development of skills through practice, effort and action (Pilimmaksarniq or Pijariuqsarniq);

•        Working together for a common cause (Piliriqatigiinniq or Ikajuqtigiinniq);

•        Being innovative and resourceful (Qanuqtuurniq); and

•        Respect and care for the land, animals, and the environment (Avatittinnik Kamatsiarniq)

The curricula of the provinces and territories are intended to express what students must know and be able to do to prepare for adult citizenship. Public schooling benefits all of us by making sure that each student is prepared for adult citizenship. Public schooling is not about you or me, but about us.  



[i] Manitoba, The Public Schools Act C.C.S.M. c. P250,

[ii] Alberta, Education Act, Statutes of Alberta, 2012  c. E-0.3

[iii] Ontario, Education Act, RSO 1990, c. E.2

[iv] Manitoba, Ibid.

[v] Nova Scotia, Education Act,

[vi] Alberta, Ibid

[vii] British Columbia School Act, RSBC 1996

[viii]  British Columbia, Statement of Education Policy Order, OIC 1280/89

[ix] Ibid.

[x] Nunavut, Education Act, S.Nu. 2008

Wednesday, February 19, 2020

Taking the public out of public schooling


Taking the public out of public schooling


Charles Ungerleider, Professor Emeritus, The University of British Columbia
[Permission granted to reproduce if authorship is acknowledged]


We see daily the frontal assault on public institutions in the United States by its commander in chief. Castigating the judiciary, eliminating regulations for the protection of the environment, and demeaning anyone whose views are different from his are so quotidian that there is no time to appraise the impact. It is tempting to see them as random acts of a rogue politician, but they are not. They are part of a strategy to destabilize, and sow distrust in, democratic institutions.

The assault on democratic institutions did not originate with the current president of the United States. It has a long, meandering history of smaller skirmishes that were less apparent because they were regional in their focus. They are well documented in several books, but most notably in Nancy MacLean’s Democracy in Chains: The Deep History of the Radical Right's Stealth Plan for America.

Friends who have read the book argue that Canada is different. Canada’s reliance on peace, order and good government makes us different from the US where “liberty” is one of the elements in the trinity life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Liberty and libertarianism are simply not themes in Canadian politics – well, not very much anyway.

Gone, but not forgotten is Maxime Bernier who deliberately gave the impression that Canada is beset by mass immigration and who thinks the jury is out about climate change. His policy prescriptions were abolishing foreign aid; lowering personal taxes; experimenting with private delivery of health care; and privatizing Canada Post, among others.  

Bernier is gone for now, but these ideas, and ones like them, are a central part of an effort to severely restrict what governments do for citizens in the belief that market forces allow citizens to look after themselves.  Dr. MacLean documents the efforts of the libertarians to give prominence to their ideas and to use those ideas to reduce or eliminate the legislative and regulatory functions of government to permit the private sector to take over public goods for private benefit.

Let me bring the argument to the institution I know best - public schools, the institution most central to the preservation of democracy.

Almost 20 years ago I argued that we were failing our children and grandchildren by ignoring the factors eroding public schools: using public funds for the support of private schools; creating social divisions among families by offering them the opportunity to choose the schools their children attend and segregating them from the children of families who are different; promoting charter schools; allowing for-profit enterprises to provide food services in schools; and diminishing the common experience that schools once provided and their part in transmitting values. If anything, these factors are more prominent today that they were 20 years ago. 

A seemingly small change to Alberta’s Education Act makes a symbolic difference that, in the long term, will have a major impact. Alberta’s Education Act was recently amended to eliminate the word public in public school board. The justification for the change is that it permits all school jurisdictions, now called divisions, to determine, among other thing, the electoral boundaries for the division and the areas from which trustees are elected.

Eliminating the public in public education blurs the lines between public schools, charter schools, and private schools. The change creates the impression that all schools are simply equivalent choices. But they are not. Private schools have great latitude in the students they will admit and retain; public schools accept all students and have relatively well-defined grounds for expelling students. Charter schools may establish the conditions under which teachers teach and students learn - conditions that in public schools are regulated by provincial statute, school board policy, and collective agreements.

As I said before, the elimination of the word “public” in Alberta’s public schools may seem minor, but, in the long run, it will have significant consequences.